Shorter Sentences. Fewer Consequences. Greater Risk.

Understanding the Serious Impact of Recent Resentencing Proposals on Community Safety

      Over the past several years, Assemblymember Ash Kalra has supported a series of criminal justice proposals focused on reducing sentences, expanding post-conviction review, and adjusting parole eligibility for individuals convicted of serious and violent crimes. While aimed at improving rehabilitation, these reforms have serious consequences that are jeopardizing community safety.

   Victims’ advocates and public safety organizations are raising grave concerns about how these changes could affect our communities, weaken accountability, and make victims even more vulnerable.

      Crime Victims United stands strong in our mission to protect and support those impacted by crime, which is why we are standing up to spread the word about how proposed policies may affect those most directly impacted by violent crime and to encourage a balanced approach that considers safety, accountability, and fairness for all Californians.

What’s Happening Now: Changes to Life Sentences

      Assemblymember Kalra is currently advancing legislation, AB 622, that if passed would significantly shorten the time individuals serving life sentences must spend in prison before becoming eligible for parole. By requiring that credits for good behavior, rehabilitation, and educational achievement all be applied toward minimum confinement periods—including for individuals convicted of murder—this proposal reduces the meaning of “life” sentences handed down by courts.

     When sentences are shortened and accountability is reduced for violent and serious crimes, communities bear the risk. Crime victims are put in real danger and sidelined by a system that was meant to protect them.

      Public safety reforms must balance fairness with consequences. Kalra’s legislative approach repeatedly tips that balance away from victims and toward offenders—without adequate safeguards for community safety.

The Human Impact: Victims and Families

      Behind every serious crime is a person or family whose life was permanently changed. For many victims, sentencing provides a measure of certainty and closure. When sentences are reconsidered or modified years later, families may be required to relive traumatic experiences and navigate complex legal processes once again.

PROGRAMS

A Broader Legislative Pattern

      The current push to shorten life sentences is not an outlier. It is part of a legislative agenda that prioritizes reduced incarceration, expanded legal remedies for offenders, and fewer consequences for serious crimes—often at the expense of victims’ rights and public safety.

Recent measures include legislation to:

  • Reopen long-final criminal convictions (AB 256, 2022)

  • Expand judicial authority to vacate sentences (AB 256, 2022; AB 1071, 2025)

  • Require courts to prioritize alternatives to incarceration (AB 2167, 2022)

  • Shorten parole eligibility timelines for serious and violent offenses (AB 622, 2025)

  • Expand post-conviction challenges and disclosure requirements (AB 2542, 2020)

      Taken together, these bills weaken accountability and shift the justice system away from supporting victims and communities that we should be focused on protecting.

Take Action to Support Victims and Public Safety

Contact Assemblymember Kalra at 408-286-2535 to stop AB 622 and legislation that puts public safety at risk.

Who We Are: About Crime Victims United

      Crime Victims United is a non-profit dedicated to supporting victims of crime and their families. We provide vital resources, including legal guidance, connections to essential support programs, and a compassionate ear for those in need.

      Crime Victims United supports justice policies that protect fairness without sacrificing safety. We are raising awareness of this issue with the support of our partners at the Peace Officers Research Association of California because victims should not be forced to repeatedly defend sentences already imposed by the courts. Communities should not be placed at greater risk in the name of reform.

      California can pursue meaningful justice reform—but it cannot do so by ignoring victims’ trauma or undermining public safety.

RESOURCES
NEWS